Translations:Expression Manager/66/en - Revision history

FuzzyBot: Importando nueva versión desde fuente externa

2013-06-04T15:33:46Z

Importando nueva versión desde fuente externa

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 4 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	!Style!!Pros!!Cons		!Style!!Pros!!Cons
	\|-		\|-
	\|Conditions\|\|1. Nice GUI for creating simple conditions <br />2. GUI well documented and understood by support team\|\|1. Only supports simple comparisons and does not AND/OR conditions well <br />2. Cascading conditions work erratically <br />3. Slow - database intensive, so can slow down long surveys <br />4. Some reported problems with re-loading conditions <br />5. GUI doesn't scale well when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of questions <br />6. May be slow to convert paper-based surveys since must use SGQA names <br />7. Often need a programmer to custom-code logic needed for complex branching		\|Conditions\|\|1. Nice GUI for creating simple conditions <br/>2. GUI well documented and understood by support team\|\|1. Only supports simple comparisons and does not AND/OR conditions well <br/>2. Cascading conditions work erratically <br/>3. Slow - database intensive, so can slow down long surveys <br/>4. Some reported problems with re-loading conditions <br/>5. GUI doesn't scale well when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of questions <br/>6. May be slow to convert paper-based surveys since must use SGQA names <br/>7. Often need a programmer to custom-code logic needed for complex branching
	\|-		\|-
	\|Relevance\|\|1. Supports very complex logic, including 80+ functions and math/string operators <br />2. Perfect support for cascading logic <br />3. Fast - no extra database calls, so supports 1000+ question surveys <br />4. No problems with re-loading logic since does not require SGQA codes <br />5. Syntax-highlighting scales to 1000+ question surveys <br />6. Easy and fast to use for groups wanting to computerize existing paper-based suveys. <br />7. Easily supports semi-structured interviews and epidemiological surveys without needing a programmers\|\|1. No GUI for simple conditions - use syntax-highlighting instead <br />2. New, so support teams have not mastered EM yet.		\|Relevance\|\|1. Supports very complex logic, including 80+ functions and math/string operators <br/>2. Perfect support for cascading logic <br/>3. Fast - no extra database calls, so supports 1000+ question surveys <br/>4. No problems with re-loading logic since does not require SGQA codes <br/>5. Syntax-highlighting scales to 1000+ question surveys <br/>6. Easy and fast to use for groups wanting to computerize existing paper-based suveys. <br/>7. Easily supports semi-structured interviews and epidemiological surveys without needing a programmers\|\|1. No GUI for simple conditions - use syntax-highlighting instead <br/>2. New, so support teams have not mastered EM yet.
	\|}		\|}

C schmitz: Text replace - "
" to "
"

2013-05-23T07:12:28Z

Text replace - " " to " "

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 23 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	!Style!!Pros!!Cons		!Style!!Pros!!Cons
	\|-		\|-
	\|Conditions\|\|1. Nice GUI for creating simple conditions <br/>2. GUI well documented and understood by support team\|\|1. Only supports simple comparisons and does not AND/OR conditions well <br/>2. Cascading conditions work erratically <br/>3. Slow - database intensive, so can slow down long surveys <br/>4. Some reported problems with re-loading conditions <br/>5. GUI doesn't scale well when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of questions <br/>6. May be slow to convert paper-based surveys since must use SGQA names <br/>7. Often need a programmer to custom-code logic needed for complex branching		\|Conditions\|\|1. Nice GUI for creating simple conditions <br />2. GUI well documented and understood by support team\|\|1. Only supports simple comparisons and does not AND/OR conditions well <br />2. Cascading conditions work erratically <br />3. Slow - database intensive, so can slow down long surveys <br />4. Some reported problems with re-loading conditions <br />5. GUI doesn't scale well when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of questions <br />6. May be slow to convert paper-based surveys since must use SGQA names <br />7. Often need a programmer to custom-code logic needed for complex branching
	\|-		\|-
	\|Relevance\|\|1. Supports very complex logic, including 80+ functions and math/string operators <br/>2. Perfect support for cascading logic <br/>3. Fast - no extra database calls, so supports 1000+ question surveys <br/>4. No problems with re-loading logic since does not require SGQA codes <br/>5. Syntax-highlighting scales to 1000+ question surveys <br/>6. Easy and fast to use for groups wanting to computerize existing paper-based suveys. <br/>7. Easily supports semi-structured interviews and epidemiological surveys without needing a programmers\|\|1. No GUI for simple conditions - use syntax-highlighting instead <br/>2. New, so support teams have not mastered EM yet.		\|Relevance\|\|1. Supports very complex logic, including 80+ functions and math/string operators <br />2. Perfect support for cascading logic <br />3. Fast - no extra database calls, so supports 1000+ question surveys <br />4. No problems with re-loading logic since does not require SGQA codes <br />5. Syntax-highlighting scales to 1000+ question surveys <br />6. Easy and fast to use for groups wanting to computerize existing paper-based suveys. <br />7. Easily supports semi-structured interviews and epidemiological surveys without needing a programmers\|\|1. No GUI for simple conditions - use syntax-highlighting instead <br />2. New, so support teams have not mastered EM yet.
	\|}		\|}

FuzzyBot: Neue Version von externer Quelle importiert

2013-05-21T07:47:34Z

Neue Version von externer Quelle importiert

New page

{| class="wikitable"
!Style!!Pros!!Cons
|-
|Conditions||1. Nice GUI for creating simple conditions 2. GUI well documented and understood by support team||1. Only supports simple comparisons and does not AND/OR conditions well 2. Cascading conditions work erratically 3. Slow - database intensive, so can slow down long surveys 4. Some reported problems with re-loading conditions 5. GUI doesn't scale well when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of questions 6. May be slow to convert paper-based surveys since must use SGQA names 7. Often need a programmer to custom-code logic needed for complex branching
|-
|Relevance||1. Supports very complex logic, including 80+ functions and math/string operators 2. Perfect support for cascading logic 3. Fast - no extra database calls, so supports 1000+ question surveys 4. No problems with re-loading logic since does not require SGQA codes 5. Syntax-highlighting scales to 1000+ question surveys 6. Easy and fast to use for groups wanting to computerize existing paper-based suveys. 7. Easily supports semi-structured interviews and epidemiological surveys without needing a programmers||1. No GUI for simple conditions - use syntax-highlighting instead 2. New, so support teams have not mastered EM yet.
|}

Translations:Expression Manager/66/en - Revision history

FuzzyBot: Importando nueva versión desde fuente externa

C schmitz: Text replace - "" to ""

FuzzyBot: Neue Version von externer Quelle importiert

C schmitz: Text replace - "
" to "
"