- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 1
Welcome to the LimeSurvey Community Forum
Ask the community, share ideas, and connect with other LimeSurvey users!
deactivate asterisk
- asilbering
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
3 years 10 months ago #200967
by asilbering
Replied by asilbering on topic deactivate asterisk
Hi Joffm,
I actually tested the survey without splitting and it still has some delay, even if I have the nivSSP question on the next page. I am expecting very "sensitive" users that will not have the patience to wait for 3 seconds every time they click on a header.
Would you have any suggestions to split the filtered array in a reasonable way?
I have made some progress with skelvanilla (see attached survey). But there is still some space between the questions, and for some reason the help now moved to the top of a question.
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Ana
I actually tested the survey without splitting and it still has some delay, even if I have the nivSSP question on the next page. I am expecting very "sensitive" users that will not have the patience to wait for 3 seconds every time they click on a header.
Would you have any suggestions to split the filtered array in a reasonable way?
I have made some progress with skelvanilla (see attached survey). But there is still some space between the questions, and for some reason the help now moved to the top of a question.
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Ana
Attachments:
The topic has been locked.
- Joffm
- Offline
- LimeSurvey Community Team
Less
More
- Posts: 12921
- Thank you received: 3976
3 years 10 months ago #201015
by Joffm
Volunteers are not paid.
Not because they are worthless, but because they are priceless
Replied by Joffm on topic deactivate asterisk
Hi, Ana,
here is an example how I would do it.
I splitted the nivSSP-question into several parts according to the main categories.
Like this:
I used subquestion relevance to display the subquestions.
This is much better.
Of course you may split more, e.g.
"2. Specific complaints and symptoms" into 2.1 - 2.4. and 2.5. - 2.9
So you have 48 and 49 subquestions instead of 97.
I used this special way to code to ease the relevance equation.
Now it's only
count(that.sq_A1.NAOK)>0
count(that.sq_A2.NAOK)>0
...
If you split the second main category, this equation have to be
count(that.sq_A21.NAOK,that.sq_A22.NAOK,that.sq_A23.NAOK,that.sq_A24.NAOK)>0
count(that.sq_A25.NAOK,that.sq_A26.NAOK,that.sq_A27.NAOK,that.sq_A28.NAOK,that.sq_A29.NAOK)>0
As I used EXCEL to quickly create the codes, the items and the subquestion relevance condition, you may change the text of the symptoms.
Furthermore here is a nice way to display your 2-level SSP question.
It automatically removes checks in subcategories if the main category is unchecked.
And here the sample file
Joffm
here is an example how I would do it.
I splitted the nivSSP-question into several parts according to the main categories.
Like this:
I used subquestion relevance to display the subquestions.
This is much better.
Of course you may split more, e.g.
"2. Specific complaints and symptoms" into 2.1 - 2.4. and 2.5. - 2.9
So you have 48 and 49 subquestions instead of 97.
I used this special way to code to ease the relevance equation.
Now it's only
count(that.sq_A1.NAOK)>0
count(that.sq_A2.NAOK)>0
...
If you split the second main category, this equation have to be
count(that.sq_A21.NAOK,that.sq_A22.NAOK,that.sq_A23.NAOK,that.sq_A24.NAOK)>0
count(that.sq_A25.NAOK,that.sq_A26.NAOK,that.sq_A27.NAOK,that.sq_A28.NAOK,that.sq_A29.NAOK)>0
As I used EXCEL to quickly create the codes, the items and the subquestion relevance condition, you may change the text of the symptoms.
Furthermore here is a nice way to display your 2-level SSP question.
It automatically removes checks in subcategories if the main category is unchecked.
And here the sample file
Joffm
Volunteers are not paid.
Not because they are worthless, but because they are priceless
The following user(s) said Thank You: asilbering
The topic has been locked.