- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
Welcome to the LimeSurvey Community Forum
Ask the community, share ideas, and connect with other LimeSurvey users!
group relevance
- lwolters
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
8 years 9 months ago #120731
by lwolters
group relevance was created by lwolters
I seem to have a problem involving group-relevance. I have 3 groups, say group1, group2 and group3. Q1_1 is in group1, Q2_1 is in group2. Now the relevance for group2 is set to (Q1_1.NAOK == 1) and the relevance for group3 to ((Q2_1.NAOK != 0) AND (! is_empty(Q2_1.NAOK))). I tested this and it does not work. If my answer on Q1_1 is 0, it should skip group2 and, because Q2_1 stays empty, also skip group3. But it does not skip group3. What am I doing wrong here? :blink:
The topic has been locked.
- steve_81
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 136
- Thank you received: 37
8 years 9 months ago - 8 years 9 months ago #120735
by steve_81
Replied by steve_81 on topic group relevance
Hi,
I built a simplified version according to your description (see attached).
And everything works as I thougt it should. I'm not completly sure if I understand the validation you expect. What I understood was:
If in Q1_1 you choose "0" (in my example answer "nein"), the group2 should skip and group3 too. That is what happens in the example.
If in Q1_1 you choose "1", group2 is displayed. If you then choose "1" = ja, group3 will show, on "0" = nein, it won't. That is what happens in the example too.
Is this assumption of validating correct?
Greetings
Stefan
I built a simplified version according to your description (see attached).
And everything works as I thougt it should. I'm not completly sure if I understand the validation you expect. What I understood was:
If in Q1_1 you choose "0" (in my example answer "nein"), the group2 should skip and group3 too. That is what happens in the example.
If in Q1_1 you choose "1", group2 is displayed. If you then choose "1" = ja, group3 will show, on "0" = nein, it won't. That is what happens in the example too.
Is this assumption of validating correct?
Greetings
Stefan
Attachments:
Last edit: 8 years 9 months ago by steve_81.
The following user(s) said Thank You: lwolters
The topic has been locked.
- lwolters
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
8 years 9 months ago #120762
by lwolters
Replied by lwolters on topic group relevance
Hi,
Your assumption is right.
I found out what caused the problem :blush: I putted my relevance-equation by accident in the wrong textbox :blush:
But thanks for your help!
Greetings,
liselot
Your assumption is right.
I found out what caused the problem :blush: I putted my relevance-equation by accident in the wrong textbox :blush:
But thanks for your help!
Greetings,
liselot
The topic has been locked.