Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Implementation of "Screen outs"

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78859

  • Mazi
  • Mazi's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • LimeSurvey Team
  • Posts: 5279
  • Thank you received: 289
  • Karma: 246
holch wrote:
What did I do wrong? As I do have quite a few screen out questions and all need to be zero quotas, I created one zero quota and added all answers that would need a zero quota to that. But what LS does is basically to take this as a "and", not an "or" as I had expected.

So by adding various answers to this quota I reduced the chance to close this quota with every answer I added.
Holger, could you please add a hint at the docs, you are probably not the only one running into such a problem.

Thanks!

Best regards/Beste Grüße,
Dr. Marcel Minke
(Limesurvey Head of Support)
Need Help? We offer professional Limesurvey support
Contact: marcel.minke(at)limesurvey.org'"
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78872

  • DenisChenu
  • DenisChenu's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Moderator Lime
  • Posts: 5869
  • Thank you received: 719
  • Karma: 223
holch wrote:
What did I do wrong? As I do have quite a few screen out questions and all need to be zero quotas, I created one zero quota and added all answers that would need a zero quota to that. But what LS does is basically to take this as a "and", not an "or" as I had expected.
Hello,

You can set a quota to for each question, then it's an OR not a AND.

It's the best way for quota: then you can have AND and OR quota on the same survey.

Denis
Last Edit: 2 years 6 days ago by DenisChenu.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78875

  • Mazi
  • Mazi's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • LimeSurvey Team
  • Posts: 5279
  • Thank you received: 289
  • Karma: 246
Denis, can you help updating the manual as well? I think this information is missing there?!

Best regards/Beste Grüße,
Dr. Marcel Minke
(Limesurvey Head of Support)
Need Help? We offer professional Limesurvey support
Contact: marcel.minke(at)limesurvey.org'"
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78878

  • DenisChenu
  • DenisChenu's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Moderator Lime
  • Posts: 5869
  • Thank you received: 719
  • Karma: 223
There are already an example with 2 quota:
docs.limesurvey.org/quotas#Example_of_a_quota
You might have to conduct a survey where you want to limit it to 25 male and 30 female respondents. You could then define a quota with a limit of 25 for the answer "Male" from your gender question in the survey. Another quota for the answer "Female" with a limit of 30 could be added as well. This will give you a maximum of 25 males who will be able to complete the survey, and a maximum of 30 females who can complete the survey.
And
docs.limesurvey.org/Quotas#Adding_multip...tion_amp_subquestion
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78886

  • Mazi
  • Mazi's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • LimeSurvey Team
  • Posts: 5279
  • Thank you received: 289
  • Karma: 246
Ahh, great. I totally overlooked them. Sorry!

Best regards/Beste Grüße,
Dr. Marcel Minke
(Limesurvey Head of Support)
Need Help? We offer professional Limesurvey support
Contact: marcel.minke(at)limesurvey.org'"
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 6 days ago #78903

  • holch
  • holch's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • LimeSurvey Team
  • Posts: 2450
  • Thank you received: 256
  • Karma: 94
I will see if I find time to have a look at this next week. This week is just crazy here.

Maybe I can add a paragraph about "screenouts"/"zero quota".
Have a look at the manual! It is a really valuable source for information. Here some helpful links:
Manual (EN) | Question Types | Question Attributes | Workarounds

If you found this answer helpful and it saved you some time please consider a donation to the project to keep Limesurvey going!
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Implementation of "Screen outs" 2 years 5 days ago #78912

  • DenisChenu
  • DenisChenu's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Moderator Lime
  • Posts: 5869
  • Thank you received: 719
  • Karma: 223
holch wrote:
Maybe I can add a paragraph about "screenouts"/"zero quota".
Yep,

Good idea :)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Implementation of "Screen outs" 16 hours 39 minutes ago #107847

  • fsantoso
  • fsantoso's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Lemon
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 0
Hi,

I notice that the initial problem of this topic had been solved a couple years back by assigning zero Quota. However I still have a question regarding screening out and would really appreciate any input.

Using zero Quota for screening out is a wonderful solution and works perfectly. However there are circumstances where Quota becomes not feasible, such as where the question types are not supported by Quota.

In my case, I have an array question (attached picture.png) where the allowed answers to go to the next questions are (Q_Question2.NAOK == "A" || Q_Question2.NAOK == "B" || Q_Question2.NAOK == "C"), otherwise the user will be screened out. This condition is not supported by Quota, therefore my only solution would be through Relevance.

This method works fine and screens out respondents as it should. However my question is that although the respondent get screened out, LS recognizes the response as COMPLETED whereas it should have been INCOMPLETE as the respondent get screened out. Is there any alternative where we can still use Relevance but yet the screened out respondent is marked INCOMPLETE as it should?

This question was already asked earlier by Holch but remains unanswered.
Of course I could apply a condition to every single question following, but as the screen outs usually happen within the first few questions this would mean to copy this condition to all questions that follow. Additionally, this would mean that the person actually is registered as a finished interview, which shouldn't be.
Attachments:
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.155 seconds
Donation Image