JEfromCanada wrote:
vierundzwanzig wrote:
Hello,
what will happen if you use
[a href="shorturl"]original long url description[/a]
and the recipient can only read "no html/text only" e-mails or has switched mode to something like "text-mode, -> Switch to HTML-Mode"?
If they are not using html, they should still see a clickable link in the first part of the message (underlined), but the description will look hokey. And I suppose if a client is reading in text-only mode, the problem they have with clicking on links is going to be out of my control no matter what I do.
Well, I think that's the reason why some people try to use "raw"-links like http://localhost/ instead of [a href="http://localhost/"]localhost[/a]. There seem to be less problems with this than with the html-counterpart. Perhaps you misunderstood, even within "text-only" e-mails "raw"-links seem to work. If it's not possible in a programm/webmail-service to click on the links at all than you're right, you can't do anything against this problem (but first case seems to more realistic, I can't remeber seeing a mail program/webmail-service that can't show "raw"-links).