aukevann schrieb:
Without insight in the reasons why it behaves like it does in the current version, I would suggest that the way it worked in previous versions (no zero needed in empty fields) is more intuitive and what you would expect when configuring such a question (and how other systems I worked with behaved).
The core question is, "for questions that have min_sum_value or equals_sum_value, is 'no response' acceptable".
When I initially implemented this, 'no response' was not acceptable in those cases, but the team voted the other way, so I changed it. I can change it back, but not without first getting approval from the team (as that might mess up other operational surveys and change the behavior of a stable release.
aukevann schrieb:
Also I am a bit concerned about the templates not being backwards compatible, as we have invested in creating our own.
It is possible that we've been blowing this out of proportion a bit. The CSS extensions were meant purely to provide additional functionality, not to change functionality. They were meant to be backwards compatible. However, we have run into some cases like yours where not all tips were behaving as expected with hide_tip, which is why I suggested adding in those lines of CSS code.
I don't have a good sense of exactly what is working differently in 1.92 vs 1.91 with a built-in 1.91 template. Perhaps you could open a bug report about the templates clarifying the odd behavior you are seeing. If there is an actual bug, we could fix that in the core and authors wouldn't need to upgrade their templates.